| From: | Neil Bothwick |
| Date: | 8 May 2000 at 18:07:29 |
| Subject: | Re: Download speeds |
Conor Kerr said,
> Hi Neil,
>> > I didn't think that binary compressed archives could be compressed much
>> > further - that certainly couldn't account for the 4K extra a second,
> could
>> > it?
>>
>> No, compressed archive would show any significant improvement, if any.
> I'm not sure if I've understood what you are saying here, the comma may be
> throwing me off, but the figure of 9.2K that I quoted was for zip files.
That's because I was talking garbage. I meant ot type "wouldn't" but
typed "would" :(
>> > I don't actually know how this all works - how do you feel now about
>> > doing an article on how the internet works? ;)
>> It's magic, you don't explain it.
> You can. And you'll get paid for it! :)
If it really is magic, I can write anything and no one can dispute it :)
> "We'll provide you with great service!" - Bob, Cusomter Service manager, a
> month before they went bust.
The staff had no idea that Pace were in trouble until they turned up
for work one morning and found the gates locked :(
Neil
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/3863/3/_/468125/_/957806210/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails